Difference between revisions of "Talk:Server Architecture"

From SoylentNews
Jump to: navigation, search
(https service: new section)
(https service)
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
Hi,
 
Hi,
any plans to add https/SSL ?
+
any plans to add https/SSL ? sidd
 
+
:HTTPS SSL is in the design from a system's perspective, however but there are some outstanding issues with HTTPS in slashcode.  You can go to https://soylentnews.org right now to see for yourself.  [[Special:Contributions/67.248.154.229|67.248.154.229]] 15:21, 21 February 2014 (MST)
sidd
 

Revision as of 22:21, 21 February 2014

Potential DNS Providers


Re: DNS providers

I don't know if this is the right place to add this, but i can host secondary DNS (or primary as well if necessary)

sidd

Automated deployment

Whatever provider is used, I recommend starting with an automated deployment from the beginning. It's a lot easier than incorporating it later and you'll thank me when you grow. Puppet is easier to work with unless you are already familiar with Chef. --Dean1012 (talk) 20:17, 20 February 2014 (MST)

I don't disagree. New infrastructure will be rolled out with tools, not by hand. That's part of the reason why the Management servers are in there. I'm a big fan of Puppet and Ansible myself Zford (talk) 21:31, 20 February 2014 (MST)

https service

Hi, any plans to add https/SSL ? sidd

HTTPS SSL is in the design from a system's perspective, however but there are some outstanding issues with HTTPS in slashcode. You can go to https://soylentnews.org right now to see for yourself. 67.248.154.229 15:21, 21 February 2014 (MST)