Difference between revisions of "Talk:ProposedSpending"

From SoylentNews
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
User DonkeyChan (5551) suggests that we pay back the founders using a "50% rule", where half of the money generated beyond what is needed for the current period is split between being "banked for contingency" while the other half goes directly towards paying back the founders. [[User:Mrcoolbp|mrcoolbp]] ([[User talk:Mrcoolbp|talk]]) 22:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 
User DonkeyChan (5551) suggests that we pay back the founders using a "50% rule", where half of the money generated beyond what is needed for the current period is split between being "banked for contingency" while the other half goes directly towards paying back the founders. [[User:Mrcoolbp|mrcoolbp]] ([[User talk:Mrcoolbp|talk]]) 22:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
- i second this suggestion. paying back the founders should be a high priority so that SN can become a not-for-profit in the normal sense. it probably has tax benefits too. ~ [[User:Crutchy|crutchy]] 06:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:37, 5 January 2016

Formatting

If you have an idea for proposed spending, click "Edit" at the top of this page and list it below and sign your comment using four tildes "~~~~" (no quotes). The tildes will be replaced with a coded line signing your comment. Replies to that comment can be made by including a colon (for each level of indent) and a space after (": " or ":: " etc.) at the beginning of the reply.

Example

Convert it to dolla dolla bills y'all and make it rain! mrcoolbp (talk) 20:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

That's a horrible idea! mrcoolbp (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
I agree! mrcoolbp (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

More info on talk pages and commenting conventions

Suggestions

User DonkeyChan (5551) suggests that we pay back the founders using a "50% rule", where half of the money generated beyond what is needed for the current period is split between being "banked for contingency" while the other half goes directly towards paying back the founders. mrcoolbp (talk) 22:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

- i second this suggestion. paying back the founders should be a high priority so that SN can become a not-for-profit in the normal sense. it probably has tax benefits too. ~ crutchy 06:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)