Difference between revisions of "Finances/Archive"
|Line 38:||Line 38:|
== Comments ==
== Comments ==
Revision as of 19:09, 6 February 2014
Note: this is only a proposal! This has never been done before, and I have no idea at this time whether it's feasible, or even legal.
You can leave comments in the space below
The financial intent of the business will be to make people independent. To that end, the company will fund $52,000 annuities to be given to people who help build and maintain the system.
The purpose of the fund is to take people out of the workforce without leaving them in poverty. A fund participant receives a weekly income large enough to live on, by which they may (if they choose) leave the workforce.
Income is paid in perpetuity: payout continues after death of original recipient, can be willed, inherited, sold or given away. Income is strictly one per person.
The proposed fund account returns $52,000/year ($1000/week). Fund amount needed to attain that level is hypothetically $1 million per participant:
- 10% Overall return (Indexed fund returns over 40 years == 12%. source)
- -3.5% Inflation adjustment
- -0.5% Management fees (Similar to Fidelity Portfolio Advisory Service. source)
- -5.2% Annual payout
With these numbers, fund will gain 0.8% annual value over time, which can be used as hedge against poor market performance.
AltSlashdot will employ N people for site management. Site will accrue profits until N times $1 million is attained, and then award each employee with one annuity.
This is very good for 'employees' but it does nothing to prevent the same thing as happened to Slashdot 1.0. How is this new endeavor going to protect its users and be accountable to them? What prevents this from being a pump and dump? ~ElectricTurtle