CommunicationSystems: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Community Polling: | *Community Polling: | ||
**[http://www.debian.org/vote/ devotee] | **[http://www.debian.org/vote/ devotee] | ||
**[http://www.electoralreform.co.uk/ Electoral Reform Services] "is the UK's leading independent supplier of ballot and election services" | |||
**[https://www.surveymonkey.com/ SurveyMonkey] (3rd party) | **[https://www.surveymonkey.com/ SurveyMonkey] (3rd party) | ||
**slaschcode pollbooth rework (stderr was looking into tying slash with devotee) | **slaschcode pollbooth rework (stderr was looking into tying slash with devotee) |
Revision as of 15:23, 24 March 2014
Communication is essential to this project. Developing and implementing unique, modern methods could really further our goals. Below are some ideas on this topic. Feel free to comment on the [page].
- Community Discussion:
- story submissions on main site inviting discussion on an issue
- Consider.it is a powerful system for discussion on specific issues examaming pros and cons (try a Demo) (drag and drop "pros" and "cons" into your "opinion")
- (uses JavaScript, but they are looking for organizations to pilot with)
- Community Polling:
- devotee
- Electoral Reform Services "is the UK's leading independent supplier of ballot and election services"
- SurveyMonkey (3rd party)
- slaschcode pollbooth rework (stderr was looking into tying slash with devotee)
- Staff Communication Forum
- Mailing list
- Trac
- redmine (a Trac fork using Ruby on Rails)
- InterTwinkles
- Intertwinkles uses JavaScript but looks incredibly powerful
- Use slashcode
- See: AudioGuyWorkNotes