Historic:Moderation

Synopsis

Is Slashdot's moderation/metamoderation, despite its superiority when compared to other sites, flawed anyway? If/how to enhace it?

We invite anyone to discuss.

Is it really about "beta"?

It is claimed the reason of migrating out of slashdot is the "beta". But is it really so? Let's try to do some speculations...

"Beta" is said to be made to fit tastes of the younger audience, flowing recently en masse to Slashdot - in fact, stats show, that Slashdot is currently accesses mosltly from... schools. The same audience is, though, often scorned upon by the "low uids" as the reason of progressively "destroying the old Slashdot". Now, we could conclude, that the deeper reason for both beta and discussion quality are really kids. But it seems, it is still not so simple.

Let us consider an example. So, (i) a bunch of teenagers mods ups some tired joke, or a "captain obvious", as things like that still amuse and educate them. Now, a low uid hates that. But, despite that, (ii) the younger and the older Slashdot might still share some common interests - be it some comment insightfull for all, so a single site might make sense. How to agree that? Would some special sort of moderation be able to please both of the discussed groups?

Attach your proposals below.

A local metamoderation

The metamoderation works globally now - it is one of the factors which decide, how many mod points a user gets. What about making it ```also``` local? A metamoderating user would express his/her preferences in this way. It turns out, the user likes comments of "low uids", but dislikes comments frequently moderated by teenagers? So the system increases that user's "experience", what translates ```to mods of experienced users being somewhat more visible by the user, as opposed to mods of the school crowd```. In other words, there would not be a single score, seen by all -- a user by metamoderating would tune, or bias the scoring according to his/her needs.