Distributed: Difference between revisions

From SoylentNews
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
Slashdot has a quite geeky use base, it might be supposed, that a lot of them would be willing to use a browser plugin to access Altslashdot, if the incentive would be save the community, disable ads etc. Still, a centralised webhosting would be needed, e.g. to attract novices or to support rare browsers.
Slashdot has a quite geeky use base, it might be supposed, that a lot of them would be willing to use a browser plugin to access Altslashdot, if the incentive would be save the community, disable ads etc. Still, a centralised webhosting would be needed, e.g. to attract novices or to support rare browsers.


The idea is, that if a lot of users use a bittorrent--style decentralised hosting, running the centralised web server would be cheap enough to life off donations.
The idea is, that if a lot of users use a bittorrent--style decentralised hosting, running the centralised web server would be cheap enough to live off ads and donations.


== Technology ==
== Technology ==

Revision as of 14:05, 7 February 2014

Synopsis

Slashdot has a quite geeky use base, it might be supposed, that a lot of them would be willing to use a browser plugin to access Altslashdot, if the incentive would be save the community, disable ads etc. Still, a centralised webhosting would be needed, e.g. to attract novices or to support rare browsers.

The idea is, that if a lot of users use a bittorrent--style decentralised hosting, running the centralised web server would be cheap enough to live off ads and donations.

Technology

There is some discussion about a relevant technology already. See e.g. Could BitTorrent Be The Distributed Social Network People Have Been Clamoring For?. In fact, a rudimentary technology that would serve a static site exists already, e.g. btsync based web sites.

Surely, a lot od development would be needed. But the upside would be, that Altslashdot would be independent of businesses, dependent on users -- a good thing, as it would serve only the latter.