User:Guardian: Difference between revisions
(→Ideas) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Option 2: Expand the rating system to have a range from -100 to +100 | Option 2: Expand the rating system to have a range from -100 to +100 | ||
Option 3: Adopt a rating system of -1 to +100 | Option 3: Adopt a rating system of -1 to +100 | ||
== Costs == | |||
How will the site be paid for? | |||
Advertising? Google ads? | |||
Community donations? | |||
Free? No ads.. | |||
Memberships? $5 per person per year can go a long way If so.. optional? What benefits if memberships are purchase? What model to use? | |||
Revision as of 14:42, 8 February 2014
Just another slashdot user hoping for tomorrow to be somewhat like today, only a bit better.
Notes
Business specifications
Technical specifications
User specifications
Be able to view each article using a URL.
Be able to view each comment using a URL.
When a comment is viewed the comment children are displayed under the comment according to the user or default display rules.
Hidden posts will always be displayed with a <hidden> tagged and collapsed.
A +4 or +5 post will force the parent post to be visible, even if it is just as a 'collapsed' message.
Technical limitations
Technology
- AWS ? Amazon ?
- EC2 ?
Testing
- functional / technical / user
Ideas
.. and not just my own
- Offer a text only site
No graphics. Toned down. Skinned down.
- CDN
Distributed deliver of the site via the sites users
- Pay for the site using advertising?
Comment Rating System
Option 1: Keep slashdot ratings of -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Option 2: Expand the rating system to have a range from -100 to +100 Option 3: Adopt a rating system of -1 to +100
Costs
How will the site be paid for? Advertising? Google ads? Community donations? Free? No ads.. Memberships? $5 per person per year can go a long way If so.. optional? What benefits if memberships are purchase? What model to use?