Historic:Moderation - Revision history

Admin: Admin moved page Moderation to Historic:Moderation

2024-12-04T05:19:57Z

Admin moved page Moderation to Historic:Moderation

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:19, 4 December 2024
(No difference)

Sir Finkus at 21:01, 21 September 2016

2016-09-21T21:01:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 21 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{archival}}
	What kind of moderation system? How it would handle communities of different size and homogenity? Discuss.		What kind of moderation system? How it would handle communities of different size and homogenity? Discuss.

Janek Kozicki: small fix

2014-04-07T19:58:42Z

small fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 7 April 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:


	This is a subpage of [[FeatureList\|Feature list, you can go back to see other features planned.]]		(This is a subpage of [[FeatureList\|Feature list, you can go back to see other features planned.]])

Janek Kozicki: added link back

2014-04-07T19:56:57Z

added link back

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 7 April 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.		* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.
	* [[Extended moderation\|Complex variants]] for very "nerdy" sities.		* [[Extended moderation\|Complex variants]] for very "nerdy" sities.


			This is a subpage of [[FeatureList\|Feature list, you can go back to see other features planned.]]

Art at 09:38, 13 February 2014

2014-02-13T09:38:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 13 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.		* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.
	* [[Extended moderation\|~~Extended~~ variants]] for ~~large, diverse communities~~.		* [[Extended moderation\|Complex variants]] for very "nerdy" sities.

Art at 16:09, 12 February 2014

2014-02-12T16:09:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 12 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.		* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.
	* [[Extended moderation\|Extended variants]] for large, diverse~~, heterogegeous~~ communities.		* [[Extended moderation\|Extended variants]] for large, diverse communities.

Art at 16:09, 12 February 2014

2014-02-12T16:09:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 12 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.		* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.
	* [[Extended moderation\|~~extended~~ variants]] for large, diverse, heterogegeous communities.		* [[Extended moderation\|Extended variants]] for large, diverse, heterogegeous communities.

Art at 16:09, 12 February 2014

2014-02-12T16:09:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 12 February 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.		* Mostly [[Traditional moderation\|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.
	* ~~Various~~ [[Extended moderation\|extended~~/experimental~~ variants]] for large, diverse, heterogegeous communities.		* [[Extended moderation\|extended variants]] for large, diverse, heterogegeous communities.

Art: Replaced content with "What kind of moderation system? How it would handle communities of different size and homogenity? Discuss. * Mostly traditional /. moderation, ..."

2014-02-12T15:55:57Z

Replaced content with "What kind of moderation system? How it would handle communities of different size and homogenity? Discuss. * Mostly traditional /. moderation, ..."

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Is it really about "beta"? ==
+What kind of moderation system? How it would handle communities of different size and homogenity? Discuss.
-"Beta" is said to be made to fit tastes of the younger audience, flowing recently en masse to Slashdot - in fact, stats show, that Slashdot is currently
+* Mostly [[Traditional moderation|traditional /. moderation]], with tweaks, though.
-accesses mosltly from... schools. The same audience is, though, often scorned upon by the "low uids" as the reason of progressively "destroying the old Slashdot".
+* Various [[Extended moderation|extended/experimental variants]] for large, diverse, heterogegeous communities.

Art: /* Example implementation */

2014-02-12T15:40:10Z

Example implementation

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:40, 12 February 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Example implementation ==		== Example implementation ==
	Let us discuss a simple, yet intuitive variant of the above.		Let us discuss a simple, yet intuitive variant of the above.
	This variant does not require any clustering methods, and most of this variant's complexities would be handled in a way invisible to the user, but still, many people might prefer a simpler moderation scheme. This is why '''a plain moderation might still be the default, and the system below would then be an opt-in''', for tweakers that do not like the "flat" scoring. The variant discussed may easily be used together with a plain moderation -- the latter would just make the resulting scoring more flat.		This variant does not require any clustering methods, and most of this variant's complexities would be handled in a way invisible to the user, but still, many people might prefer a simpler moderation scheme. This is why '''a plain moderation might still be the default, and the system below would then be an opt-in''', for tweakers that do not like the "flat" scoring. The variant discussed may easily be used together with a plain moderation -- the latter would just make the resulting scoring more or less flat, depending on how the tweaker would weight the importance of both systems.

	The quality of user contributions would consist not of a single value, but of three values: novice, neutral, veteran. A user might thus be e.g. valued a lot by teens, thanks to his school--level yet very educational contributions, or conversely, a user might be a long--bearded Unix man that is not into teaching kids at all, but loves deep, clever references to the geek culture. More examples:		The quality of user contributions would consist not of a single value, but of three values: novice, neutral, veteran. A user might thus be e.g. valued a lot by teens, thanks to his school--level yet very educational contributions, or conversely, a user might be a long--bearded Unix man that is not into teaching kids at all, but loves deep, clever references to the geek culture. More examples: