Historic:Content - Revision history

Admin: Admin moved page Content to Historic:Content

2024-12-04T05:19:48Z

Admin moved page Content to Historic:Content

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:19, 4 December 2024
(No difference)

Sir Finkus: Protected "Content" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2016-09-22T01:41:22Z

Protected "Content" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:41, 22 September 2016
(No difference)

Sir Finkus at 01:41, 22 September 2016

2016-09-22T01:41:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 22 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{archival}}
	* Scraping bad. Having editors dotted around the timezones that create their own better versions of the summaries, even if they contain just the same links as the /. story that inspired them, not bad. [[User:FatPhil\|FatPhil]] ([[User talk:FatPhil\|talk]]) 14:14, 6 February 2014 (MST)		* Scraping bad. Having editors dotted around the timezones that create their own better versions of the summaries, even if they contain just the same links as the /. story that inspired them, not bad. [[User:FatPhil\|FatPhil]] ([[User talk:FatPhil\|talk]]) 14:14, 6 February 2014 (MST)

70.179.183.155: SNR

2014-02-22T04:26:23Z

SNR

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 22 February 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:

	*Minimize internal Drama (i.e. Wiki pages for Scientology)		*Minimize internal Drama (i.e. Wiki pages for Scientology)

			* SNR - Soylent News Roundup: This would be a weekly review of the best articles/comments

Sfm at 21:21, 10 February 2014

2014-02-10T21:21:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 10 February 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* When you have the same group of minds selecting the content that gets seen, over the course of years, the users eventually get burnt out seeing the same type of stuff, chosen by the same people over and over again. The content becomes stale even if its fresh		* When you have the same group of minds selecting the content that gets seen, over the course of years, the users eventually get burnt out seeing the same type of stuff, chosen by the same people over and over again. The content becomes stale even if its fresh
	:Need to find a way to combat this.... some kind of voting system for content so it is not just the editors choice ??		:Need to find a way to combat this.... some kind of voting system for content so it is not just the editors choice ??

			*Minimize internal Drama (i.e. Wiki pages for Scientology)

Sfm at 21:19, 10 February 2014

2014-02-10T21:19:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 10 February 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	** Scraping bad. Having editors dotted around the timezones that create their own better versions of the summaries, even if they contain just the same links as the /. story that inspired them, not bad. [[User:FatPhil\|FatPhil]] ([[User talk:FatPhil\|talk]]) 14:14, 6 February 2014 (MST)		* Scraping bad. Having editors dotted around the timezones that create their own better versions of the summaries, even if they contain just the same links as the /. story that inspired them, not bad. [[User:FatPhil\|FatPhil]] ([[User talk:FatPhil\|talk]]) 14:14, 6 February 2014 (MST)

	** Agree with scraping bad. The general trend for the summaries has gone downhill badly over the past few years so better to have editors (re-)publish articles even if they use the same (or better) links ([[User:Qwade\|Qwade]])		* Agree with scraping bad. The general trend for the summaries has gone downhill badly over the past few years so better to have editors (re-)publish articles even if they use the same (or better) links ([[User:Qwade\|Qwade]])

			* When you have the same group of minds selecting the content that gets seen, over the course of years, the users eventually get burnt out seeing the same type of stuff, chosen by the same people over and over again. The content becomes stale even if its fresh
			:Need to find a way to combat this.... some kind of voting system for content so it is not just the editors choice ??

Sfm: Created page with "** Scraping bad. Having editors dotted around the timezones that create their own better versions of the summaries, even if they contain just the same links as the /. story th..."

2014-02-10T19:44:37Z

Created page with "** Scraping bad. Having editors dotted around the timezones that create their own better versions of the summaries, even if they contain just the same links as the /. story th..."

New page

** Scraping bad. Having editors dotted around the timezones that create their own better versions of the summaries, even if they contain just the same links as the /. story that inspired them, not bad. [[User:FatPhil|FatPhil]] ([[User talk:FatPhil|talk]]) 14:14, 6 February 2014 (MST)

** Agree with scraping bad. The general trend for the summaries has gone downhill badly over the past few years so better to have editors (re-)publish articles even if they use the same (or better) links ([[User:Qwade|Qwade]])