<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.soylentnews.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Threering</id>
	<title>SoylentNews - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.soylentnews.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Threering"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.soylentnews.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Threering"/>
	<updated>2026-05-16T22:04:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.soylentnews.org/index.php?title=FAQ&amp;diff=3814</id>
		<title>FAQ</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.soylentnews.org/index.php?title=FAQ&amp;diff=3814"/>
		<updated>2014-02-10T03:26:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Threering: Changed &amp;quot;forums.AltSlashdot.org&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;forums.SoylentNews.org&amp;quot;.  Fixed a couple of spelling mistakes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;=Frequently Asked Questions=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is this site about===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a news site alternative to Slashdot. It runs an interface much like Slashdot ''used'' to be&lt;br /&gt;
- better articles, less decoration and less &amp;quot;in your face&amp;quot; functionality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Who owns this site===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site is owned and run by John Barrabas John (at) AltSlashdot (dot) org.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may change in a month or so when we choose a business model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What if Dice decides to revert to Classic Slashdot?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general feeling is that the quality of articles on Slashdot has&lt;br /&gt;
become poor. We think we can do a better job, so the project will continue regardless of what&lt;br /&gt;
Dice does with Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===How can I volunteer?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volunteering is done via the group forums: you join a group to contribute via a forum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Register a user at forums.soylentnews.org&lt;br /&gt;
* Go to your user panel (UL corner of page) and then &amp;quot;Groups&amp;quot; tab&lt;br /&gt;
* Add yourself to interesting groups&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For almost all facets of the site, contributions are made by community consent: If you can convince the community in your forum group, we'll do it. You don't need permission of the owner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The owner controls certain narrow aspects of the site such as domain registration, money, &lt;br /&gt;
legal, and such. This may change when we choose a business model.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Will the code be released open source?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Will the database be released open source?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, providing there are no legal issues or other &amp;quot;gotchas&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the subject of making things open source, someone suggested that the database be &lt;br /&gt;
separated via API from the presentation. People could then write other interfaces and presentation methods that show the data in various ways. It would also allow program access &lt;br /&gt;
to the data for things such as searching and other uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is an excellent idea. Barring any insurmountable issues, I'll try to make&lt;br /&gt;
that happen during the rewrite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Will you be taking articles/content from Slashdot?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't consider it fair. Slashdot put a lot of effort into building their brand and&lt;br /&gt;
community. If we are to succeed, we need to do it on our own merits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm deciding this as benevolent dictator. Regardless of community sentiment, we won't be&lt;br /&gt;
poaching from Slashdot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Doesn't AltSlashdot infringe on Slashdot's trademark?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opinion on this is mixed, but it doesn't matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be choosing a new name by community consensus ''real soon'' after the initial rollout,&lt;br /&gt;
probably in the first week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===I've got this great idea for a new name===&lt;br /&gt;
===I own the domain for a new name - want it?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general feeling is that names with &amp;quot;slash&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;dot&amp;quot;, or otherwise based on a pun of Slashdot&lt;br /&gt;
would present similar problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need a name which is completely lateral, something that's ours and ours alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We will be choosing a new name by community consensus ''real soon'' after the initial rollout,&lt;br /&gt;
probably in the first week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(And some of the suggestions were brilliant. I'm particularly fond of &amp;quot;NewSlash&amp;quot;. Sadly, we can&lt;br /&gt;
use none of them.)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Threering</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>