<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.soylentnews.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Decbot</id>
	<title>SoylentNews - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.soylentnews.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Decbot"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.soylentnews.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Decbot"/>
	<updated>2026-05-16T10:09:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.soylentnews.org/index.php?title=Submission_guidelines&amp;diff=155</id>
		<title>Submission guidelines</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.soylentnews.org/index.php?title=Submission_guidelines&amp;diff=155"/>
		<updated>2014-02-06T23:25:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Decbot: /* Categories */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;As asked for on the front page: Discussion of Submission Guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wouldn't be slashdot without hot-button topics generating hundreds of posts in areas on the more political charged side of science (global warming, nuclear energy, weapons, evolution, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''I've noticed that the quality of articles on Slashdot has gone down a lot in recent years. Even if Slashdot goes back to the original format, I think we can make a much better site by having better articles.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Categories ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As is stands now OldSlashdot has the following categories on the front page.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ask Slashdot'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Book Reviews'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Games'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Idle'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''YRO'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Cloud'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hardware'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Linux''' &lt;br /&gt;
** perhaps we should add a Windows and OSX category as well or just call this Operating Systems. I'm a Linux user at home, but it seems one sided to have only a category for Linux. We should try to be unbiased when possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Management'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Mobile'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Science'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Security'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Storage'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this the same format people would want on a new site? Expand the list, or focus more on fewer categories?&lt;br /&gt;
Combine where possible (i.e.  Storage and Cloud may fit in some larger category ??)&lt;br /&gt;
Additions:&lt;br /&gt;
* Alternative Energy&lt;br /&gt;
* General Current events ?&lt;br /&gt;
* Developers&lt;br /&gt;
* Digital Currency/Bitcoin? - is anybody really interested in Bitcoin as much as the /. editors seem to be?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Decbot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>